USPTO serial 74256766
RED DIAMOND ULTRA BLEND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POMPEY, TINA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RED DIAMOND ULTRA BLEND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SANDRA GOODING MARSH
SANDRA GOODING MARSH VEAL & ASSOCIATES2001 PARK PL N STE 525BIRMINGHAM, AL 35203UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | coffee | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 1994 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 24, 1994 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 24, 1994 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 13, 1994 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 20, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 18, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 18, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 18, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 1992 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 9, 1992 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| May 27, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 19, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 12, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |