USPTO serial 74257579
BUG SHIELD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAMILTON, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BUG SHIELD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Saskatoon, Sask., CA
Saskatoon, Sask., CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | protective spray for application to vehicles to prevent insects from sticking thereto | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 12, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 17, 1993 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 8, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 7, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 6, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 16, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 29, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |