USPTO serial 74257935
CT/WORKSTATION SERVER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SZOKE, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CT/WORKSTATION SERVER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | DEVELOPMENT ENABLEMENT SOFTWARE PROVIDING COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR PROFESSIONAL COMPUTER SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT PERSONNEL WHOCREATE APPLICATION SOFTWARE; NAMELY, SOFTWARE THAT IS USED FOR DEVELOPMENT OF END-USER INTERFACES IN HETEROGENEOUS COMPUTER TERMINAL ENVIRONMENTS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 1996 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 16, 1995 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 1995 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 21, 1995 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 24, 1995 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 26, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 6, 1994 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 26, 1994 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 2, 1993 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 17, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 16, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 25, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 25, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |