USPTO serial 74258275
REPLAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEIGELL, CHARLES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with REPLAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID R. BLACK
DAVID R BLACK VAN COTT, BAGLEY, CORNWALL & MCCARTHYP O BOX 4534050 S MAIN ST STE 1600SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84145Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | polystyrene | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 1994 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Nov 1, 1993 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Sep 28, 1993 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Aug 13, 1993 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 27, 1993 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 17, 1992 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 2, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 1992 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |