USPTO serial 74259123
EVERY HAIR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BORSUK, ESTHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EVERY HAIR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce W. Schwab
BRUCE W SCHWAB TOWNSEND AND TOWNSENDONE MARKET PLZSTEUART ST TWR 20TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | hair bleaching preparations, hair conditioners, hair removing cream, shaving cream, depilatory creams, hair dyes, hair gel, non-medicated hair care preparations, hair cleaning preparations, hair color removers, hair dressings for men, hair lighteners, hair relaxing preparations, hair rinses, hair spray, hair straightening preparations, hair styling preparations, hair waving lotion, hair lotions, baby shampoo, hair shampoo, shaving balm, shaving gel, and shaving lotion | ABANDONED | — |
| 005 | medicated hair care preparations, medicated hair lotions, dandruff shampoo, and medicated shampoo | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ADVANCED POLYMER SYSTEMS
- Other trademarks owned by ADVANCED POLYMER SYSTEMS
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named EVERY HAIR
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 1995 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 17, 1995 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 28, 1995 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 17, 1995 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 7, 1994 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 24, 1994 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 15, 1994 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 17, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 11, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 16, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 15, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 10, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 2, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |