Drawing for WAFER ARRAY

USPTO serial 74259199

WAFER ARRAY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SZOKE, MICHAEL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WAFER ARRAY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Warren M. Becker

WARREN M BECKER FLIESLER, DUBB, MEYER & LOVEJOY4 EMBARCADERO CTR STE 400SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4156UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009high density semiconductor secondary storage devicesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 8, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 26, 1994ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 25, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 30, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 22, 1993CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 1, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 25, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 10, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 5, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 1, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance