USPTO serial 74263560
ROSEBUD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PRICE, JERRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ROSEBUD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Dobong-Gu, Seoul, KR
Chung-Gu, Seoul, KR
Chung-Gu, Seoul, KR
Dobong-Gu, Seoul, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph A. Kolasch
JOSEPH A KOLASCH BIRCH, STEWART, KOLASCH & BIRCHP O BOX 747FALLS CHURCH, VA 22040-0747UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Miwon Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Miwon Beverage Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Miwon Beverage Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Miwon Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named ROSEBUD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 1997 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 9, 1997 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 9, 1997 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 9, 1993 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 15, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 14, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 30, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 25, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 7, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 11, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |