USPTO serial 74263794
DOROX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 608
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MIRMAN, DONNA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DOROX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | aluminum alcoholates, and reaction products of aluminum with enols and fatty acids for use in the manufacture of finished products; namely, printing inks, greases, plant protectants, ceramics, textiles and cosmetics | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 1995 | PR.W | PETITION TO REVIVE WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 11, 1995 | PRIM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 1995 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 11, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 1992 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 15, 1992 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 4, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 1992 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 2, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |