USPTO serial 74266195
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew N. Spivak
Andrew N. Spivak Mosaic Legal Group, PLLC5185 MacArthur Boulevard, NW, Suite 350Washington, DC 20016-3341UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | educational services and entertainment services; namely, conducting classes in exercise for children | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 1, 1991 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 1, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 17, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 5, 2004 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Jul 9, 2003 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 21, 2003 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 21, 2003 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Dec 23, 2002 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 18, 1998 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 7, 1998 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Apr 10, 1998 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Feb 5, 1998 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Dec 22, 1992 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 29, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 28, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 23, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 14, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |