USPTO serial 74266235
HATCHBACK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 6, 1994
- Examiner
- COLE RICHARD G
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HATCHBACK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard L. Kirkpatrick
RICHARD L KIRKPATRICK CUSHMAN, DARBY & CUSHMAN9TH FL1100 NEW YORK AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3918Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | catalytic converters for general industrial use | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 2001 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 6, 1994 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 6, 1994 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 31, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 1994 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 13, 1994 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 1, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 1993 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 8, 1993 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 15, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 14, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 10, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 1, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |