USPTO serial 74266317
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sheldon Palmer
SHELDON PALMER GALVIN & PALMER425 PARK AVE 29TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | cosmetics; namely, bath gels, hair conditioners, skin moisturizers, hair shampoos and skin, toilet, deodorant and bath soaps | ABANDONED | — |
| 016 | paper goods and printed matter; namely, bar coasters, place mats, calendars, napkins, menus, stationery and art prints | ABANDONED | — |
| 018 | leather goods; namely, luggage and luggage tags made of leather | ABANDONED | — |
| 021 | housewares and glass; namely, container closures used upon glass tumblers, dining and serving dishes, serving platters and trays not of precious metal, plates, bowls, cups, saucers, salt and pepper shakers, vases, coffee and teapots not of precious metal, and beverage glasses, pitchers and mugs | ABANDONED | — |
| 024 | fabrics; namely, bed and table linens and towels | ABANDONED | — |
| 025 | men's, women's and children's clothing; namely, T-shirts and robes | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | health spa services, hotel, restaurant, bar, cocktail lounge, providing banquet and social function facilities for special occasions, catering, barbershop and beauty salon services, art gallery services, photo studio services, personal valet and parking valet services and retail pharmacy, retail florist shops, retail shops featuring men's, women's and children's clothing and art providing meeting and convention room facilities | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 1995 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 11, 1994 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 23, 1994 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 4, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 12, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 10, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 10, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 6, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 8, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |