USPTO serial 74266336
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
San Luis Obispo, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Todd Mirolla
J TODD MIROLLA ANDRE, MORRIS & BUTTERY1304 PACIFIC STPOST OFFICE BOX 730SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93406-0730| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | wearing apparel | ABANDONED | Sep 24, 1991 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 1994 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Oct 29, 1993 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Sep 1, 1993 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Jul 26, 1993 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 10, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |