USPTO serial 74266445
CUSTOMER SATISFACTION INVOLVE EVERYONE CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT MANAGEMENT LEADERSHIP AND SUPPORT QUALITY PROFESSIONAL EXCELLENCE INTEGRITY RESPECT FOR PEOPLE TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT REWARD AND RECOGNITION COMMUNICATION AND TEAMWORK PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LE, MARGARET
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CUSTOMER SATISFACTION INVOLVE EVERYONE CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT MANAGEMENT LEADERSHIP AND SUPPORT QUALITY PROFESSIONAL EXCELLENCE INTEGRITY RESPECT FOR PEOPLE TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT REWARD AND RECOGNITION COMMUNICATION AND TEAMWORK PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas M. Gibson
THOMAS M GIBSON HEDMAN, GIBSON & COSTIGAN, PC1185 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-2601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | management consulting services | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORP.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named CUSTOMER SATISFACTION INVOLVE EVERYONE CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT MANAGEMENT LEADERSHIP AND SUPPORT QUALITY PROFESSIONAL EXCELLENCE INTEGRITY RESPECT FOR PEOPLE TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT REWARD AND RECOGNITION COMMUNICATION AND TEAMWORK PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 1994 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 8, 1994 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 8, 1994 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 8, 1994 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 25, 1993 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 1993 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 2, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 13, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 29, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |