USPTO serial 74266690
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William E. O'Brien
WILLIAM E O'BRIEN FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI801 PENNSYLVANIA AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20004UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | travel wholesale services; namely, providing information about destinations, and selling tourism services consisting of hotel accommodations, bus excursions, and sightseeing tours to tour operators and travel agencies; tour operator services and receptive agent services; namely, providing information about travel, tours and destinations and providing and arranging travel services consisting of tours, hotel accommodations, airline tickets, bus excursions, sightseeing tours; and meet and greet and transfer services to travel agencies and to the general public; and tour wholesaler services; namely, developing and marketing destinations and travel tours consisting of hotel accommodations, bus excursions, sightseeing tours, flight arrangements and airline tickets directly to tour operators, travel agencies and the general public | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 5, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 3, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 1995 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 20, 1995 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 21, 1995 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 21, 1995 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 21, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 27, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 25, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 3, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 16, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |