USPTO serial 74267302
PC LABS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEVY, MICHAEL S
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PC LABS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrea Van Kampen
ANDREA VAN KAMPEN ZIFF COMMUNICATIONS COMPANYONE PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | series of magazine columns dealing with testing, analysis and review of products in the fields of computers and information services | ABANDONED | Jan 28, 1986 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ziff Communications Company
- Other trademarks owned by Ziff Communications Company
- Other trademarks owned by ZIFF-DAVIS PUBLISHING COMPANY, L.P.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named PC LABS
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 2, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 1993 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 28, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 11, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 9, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 1, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 4, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |