USPTO serial 74267327
THE BENCHMARK OF INDUSTRIAL IMAGING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MULLEN, MARK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE BENCHMARK OF INDUSTRIAL IMAGING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael H. Diamant
MICHAEL H DIAMANT KAHN, KLEINMAN, YANOWITZ & ARNSON COTHE TWR AT ERIEVIEW1301 E NINTH ST STE 2600CLEVELAND, OH 44114-1824Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | repairing, maintaining, and installing medical imaging diagnostic and therapeutic equipment, rooms, accessories and supplies | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | training people in the use and operation of medical imaging diagnostic and therapeutic equipment | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | door to door and catalog sales featuring medical imaging diagnostic and therapeutic equipment, accessories, and supplies, industrial non-destructive testing equipment; namely, quality control and technical aids screens, cassettes and film holders, film identification devices, darkroom and processing equipment, film viewing storage and handling equipment, protective equipment and materials, X-ray inspection particle equipment and supplies, and X-ray film and radiographic supplies accessories, and supplies; designing rooms for medical imaging diagnostic and therapeutic equipment and designing systems of medical imaging diagnostic and therapeutic equipment for customer needs | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by E. G. Baldwin and Associates, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by E. G. Baldwin and Associates, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named THE BENCHMARK OF INDUSTRIAL IMAGING
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 1994 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 2, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 10, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 9, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 14, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 26, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 4, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |