Drawing for GRANITE LINKS

USPTO serial 74267415

GRANITE LINKS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DUNN, ELIZABETH A
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with GRANITE LINKS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sandra E. Lundy

SANDRA E LUNDY TESTA, HURWITZ & THIBEAULT53 STATE STBOSTON, MA 02109UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009wireless computer network employing RF (radio frequency) spread spectrum radio transmission consisting of computer hardware, one or more RF base stations, multiple RF handheld data communicators, and computer programs for data communications in the field of service industry productivity improvementABANDONED—
016printed user manuals for computer hardware sub-system consisting of a base station, one or more videopad data communications terminals, and computer programs for use in data communicationsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 29, 1996ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 6, 1995CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 23, 1993CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 15, 1993CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 23, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 8, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 18, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 6, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 15, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance