Drawing for ARCHITECTURAL TRIM

USPTO serial 74267702

ARCHITECTURAL TRIM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MATTHEWS, AMOS
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARCHITECTURAL TRIM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Laurie A. Ebling

LAURIE A EBLING REISING, ETHINGTON, BARNARD, ET ALP O BOX 4390TROY, MI 48099UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019building materials; namely, decorative building accents made of polymeric material including; pilasters; crossheads and mantels; pediments; window and door treatments consisting of decorative headers, panels, trim, moulding; exterior gable louvers; exterior and interior polymeric moulding; ceiling medallions; garage door accents and mantels; dentil blocks; corbels and brackets therefor; exterior mounting blocks; decorative polymeric panels; gable decorations; finialsABANDONEDFeb 1, 1992

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 3, 1994ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Apr 12, 1994EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 17, 1994EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Dec 13, 1993EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 16, 1993CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 29, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 27, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 6, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance