USPTO serial 74267860
HOME RACK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEIFMAN, ARI
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HOME RACK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mississauga, Ontario L5C 1V9, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James W. McKee
JAMES W MCKEE FAY, SHARPE, BEALL, FAGAN, ET AL1100 SUPERIOR AVE STE 701CLEVELAND, OH 44114-2518UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | light duty steel shelving units for residential use | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 1994 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 14, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |