Drawing for AUSLANDISCHES ERZEUGNIS RUSSISCHER WODKA IMPORTIERT AUS DER UDSSR ORIGINAL ORIGINAL MOSKOVSKAYA OSOBAYA WODKA 40% VOL 0,5L HERGESTELLT UND AUF FLASCHEN GEFULLT IN DER UDSSR FUR SOJUZPLODOIMPORT MOSKAU IMPORTIERT DURCH SIMEX 5170 JULICH DEUTSCHLAND

USPTO serial 74267871

AUSLANDISCHES ERZEUGNIS RUSSISCHER WODKA IMPORTIERT AUS DER UDSSR ORIGINAL ORIGINAL MOSKOVSKAYA OSOBAYA WODKA 40% VOL 0,5L HERGESTELLT UND AUF FLASCHEN GEFULLT IN DER UDSSR FUR SOJUZPLODOIMPORT MOSKAU IMPORTIERT DURCH SIMEX 5170 JULICH DEUTSCHLAND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AUSLANDISCHES ERZEUGNIS RUSSISCHER WODKA IMPORTIERT AUS DER UDSSR ORIGINAL ORIGINAL MOSKOVSKAYA OSOBAYA WODKA 40% VOL 0,5L HERGESTELLT UND AUF FLASCHEN GEFULLT IN DER UDSSR FUR SOJUZPLODOIMPORT MOSKAU IMPORTIERT DURCH SIMEX 5170 JULICH DEUTSCHLAND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PHILIP T. SHANNON

PHILIP T SHANNON PENNIE & EDMONDS1155 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033vodka originating in RussiaACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 7, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 4, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 14, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 18, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 4, 2002OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Dec 4, 2002OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
May 16, 2002OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
May 16, 2002OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
May 20, 1994OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Feb 24, 1994OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Nov 2, 1993PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 1, 1993NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 26, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 16, 1993CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 13, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 5, 1993ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 19, 1993CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 28, 1993CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 3, 1993CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 14, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 29, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 13, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 12, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 8, 1992LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
Aug 12, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance