USPTO serial 74267992
ECO WASH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALT, JILL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ECO WASH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan Upton Douglass
SUSAN UPTON DOUGLASS FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing; namely, tops, shirts, pants, shorts, vests, jackets, skirts and overalls | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 3, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 22, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 16, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 23, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 19, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 5, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 25, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 22, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 10, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 27, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 9, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 1, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 1, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 1, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |