USPTO serial 74268078
TUFF FILM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 10, 1994
- Examiner
- KREBS, CATHERINE K.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TUFF FILM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Z. Peter Sawicki
Z PETER SAWICKI KINNEY & LANGE, PASTE 1500625 FOURTH AVE SMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55415-1659Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | all-purpose plastic film sold in sheets for use in construction, agriculture and household use as a protective barrier, e.g., as a vapor barrier in construction; as a protective cover for farm equipment, hay and wood piles; and as pool coverings and exterior window coverings | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2001 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 10, 1994 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 3, 1994 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 24, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 1994 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 6, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 1993 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 3, 1993 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 1993 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 27, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |