Drawing for TORQUE LIMITING

USPTO serial 74268920

TORQUE LIMITING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STINE, DAVID
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TORQUE LIMITING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles I. Brodsky

CHARLES I BRODSKY9 S MAIN STMARLBORO, NJ 07746UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007aircraft engine parts; namely, starter-generators and generator control unitsABANDONEDSep 20, 1988

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 28, 1994ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 28, 1994EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 28, 1994EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 31, 1994CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Feb 24, 1994REINREINSTATED—
Dec 30, 1993ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 19, 1993CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 14, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 2, 1993NAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED—
Jan 6, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 14, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 8, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance