Drawing for IMAGINE

USPTO serial 74268974

IMAGINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
—
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IMAGINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cheryl M. Friedman

CHERYL M FRIEDMAN100 UNIVERSAL CITY PLZUNIVERSAL CITY, CA 91608UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020slumber bags, and rocking chairsABANDONED—
021clothes racks, beverage glassware, mugs, plates, bowls, kits for carrying snacks and meals consisting of a container for carrying cutlery, napkins, and food and beverage containers, and sets consisting of a comb, brush and hand-held mirror for personal groomingABANDONED—
024towels, sheets, pillow cases, bedspreads, blankets, and curtainsABANDONED—
028computer games, video games, action figures and accessories, parlor games, masquerade masks, toy vehicles, toy weapons, plush toys, craft kits, balls, accessories for ball games, dolls, doll accessories, and toy hatsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 30, 1997ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 18, 1996EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Aug 16, 1996EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jun 20, 1996EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 27, 1996EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 16, 1995EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 20, 1995EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 18, 1995EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 28, 1995EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 20, 1994EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 13, 1994EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 29, 1994NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 4, 1994PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 3, 1993NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 5, 1993CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 18, 1993ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 4, 1993CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 8, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 10, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 23, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 8, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 6, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance