USPTO serial 74269389
BASIC EQUIPMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, ANDREW D
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BASIC EQUIPMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas I. Rozsa
THOMAS I ROZSA THOMAS I ROZSA, ATTORNEY AT LAWIMPERIAL BANK BLDG STE 108115303 VENTURA BLVDSHERMAN OAKS, CA 91403-3110Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | men's and boy's wearing apparel; namely, T-shirts, sweatshirts, tank tops, woven shirts, sweaters, cardigans, vests, jackets, pants, sweatpants, shorts, hats, caps, coats, shoes, socks, and underwear; and women's and girl's wearing apparel; namely, T-shirts, sweatshirts, tank tops, woven shirts, sweaters, cardigans, vests, jackets, pants, sweatpants, shorts, skirts, dresses, blouses, hats, caps, coats, shoes, socks, and underwear | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 1993 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 1, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |