USPTO serial 74269764
ADCOM TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PESKA, KEVIN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ADCOM TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Pompano Beach, FL
Pompano Beach, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jay R. Faeges
JAY R FAEGES GOODAMN WEISS FREEDMAN100 ERIEVIEW PLZ 27TH FLCLEVELAND, OH 44114-1824UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | facsimile imaging telecopiers and related accessories; namely, image scanners, computer hardware, computer software, and printers for use therewith | ABANDONED | — |
| 037 | installation, repair and maintenance of facsimile imaging telecopiers and related acessories; namely, image scanners, computer hardware, computer software, and printers for use threwith | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | distributorship services in the field of facsimile imaging telecopiers and related accessories; namely, image scanners, computer hardware, computer software and printers for use therewith | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 1995 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 21, 1995 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 21, 1995 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 9, 1994 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 20, 1994 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 1, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 14, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 14, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |