USPTO serial 74269773
APPLE NECTAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLOHM, LINDA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with APPLE NECTAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
North Little Rock, AR
North Little Rock, AR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark K. Halter
MARK K HALTER HILBURN, CALHOON, HARPER, ET ALEIGHTH FL THE TWIN CITY BANK BLDGONE RIVERFRONT PL P O BOX 5551NORTH LITTLE ROCK, AR 72119Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | hair care preparations; namely, shampoo, conditioner, hair spray, mousse, and gel | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 21, 1994 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 6, 1994 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 6, 1994 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 22, 1993 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 15, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 14, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 29, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 22, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 1992 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 9, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 3, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |