USPTO serial 74270694
BEN'S BREAD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MIRMAN, DONNA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BEN'S BREAD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | bread mixes composed primarily of flour and other ingredients for bread baking | ABANDONED | Nov 6, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 1999 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 27, 1998 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 27, 1998 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 15, 1994 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 11, 1993 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 10, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 16, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 16, 1993 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 12, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 1993 | IURF | IU INFORMAL RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 1992 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Nov 19, 1992 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 31, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |