USPTO serial 74270804
COSA NOSTRA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COSA NOSTRA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carol L.B. Matthews
CAROL L B MATTHEWS POPHAM HAIK SCHNOBRICH & KAUFMAN655 15TH ST N WSTE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20005-5701Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | skin soaps, shaving balm, shaving cream, shaving gel, shaving lotion; perfume and perfume oil; essential oils for personal use; cosmetics; namely, skin cream, skin emollients, skin lotion, skin moisturizer, skin toners, sun tanning preparations, bath pearls, milk bath, bath gel, bath oil, bath powder, bath salts; deodorants for personal use; non-medicated hair care preparations and dentifrices | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 29, 1995 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 25, 1994 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 14, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 12, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 14, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 9, 1993 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Sep 9, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 8, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 5, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 3, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |