USPTO serial 74271787
AQS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHANAHAN, PATRICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AQS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark J. Liss
MARK J LISS LEYDIG, VOIT & MAYERTWO PRUDENTIAL PLZ STE 4900CHICAGO, IL 60601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | photographic chemicals, photocopier chemicals; sensitized photographic film, photosensitive paper; emulsifiers for use in the manufacture of printing plates and platemaking, pressroom and other printing chemicals | ABANDONED | — |
| 007 | printing presses; sheet feeding machines; machines which process printing plates; printing plates; sheet diffusion transfer plates; projection speed plates; offset printing presses; printing cylinders, drums, presses; and parts and fittings therefor | ABANDONED | — |
| 009 | electrical, electronic, photographic, reprographic, optical and control apparatus and instruments; namely, printing plate processors and film processors; apparatus for the recording, transmission or reproduction of images; namely, printing-down frames, contact frames and other exposure frames and exposure units for use in reprography; cameras, including electrostatic cameras; printers; word processors; apparatus and instruments all for the storage, retrieval, transmission or display of data; namely, prepress equipment; and parts therefor | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
- Other trademarks owned by E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named AQS
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 1995 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 14, 1994 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 9, 1994 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 1994 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 9, 1994 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 4, 1994 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 30, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 1, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 9, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 5, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 23, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 9, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |