Drawing for GREAT CHINA GC

USPTO serial 74272092

GREAT CHINA GC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GREAT CHINA GC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David N. Makous

DAVID N MAKOUS LEWIS, D'AMATO, BRISBOIS & BISGAARD221 N FIGUEROA ST STE 1200LOS ANGELES, CA 90012UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042custom imprinting of china dinnerware with decorative designsABANDONEDAug 1, 1992

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 3, 1997ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Apr 25, 1997ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 22, 1997PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 21, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 13, 1997IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Oct 19, 1994CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 30, 1994DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 10, 1994DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Feb 9, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 19, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 1993ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 23, 1993CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 28, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 28, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 1992ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 9, 1992ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 9, 1992ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 23, 1992CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 2, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 4, 1992AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 21, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 21, 1992IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Aug 21, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 13, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance