Drawing for SHOWER MATE

USPTO serial 74272109

SHOWER MATE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MATTHEWS, AMOS
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SHOWER MATE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

W. Kirk McCord

W KIRK MCCORD GLASER, GRIGGS & SCHWARTZTHREE LINCOLN CTR5430 LBJ FWY STE 1540DALLAS, TX 75240

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011shower head units; namely, combined water filters and water flow regulatorsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 15, 1994EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 15, 1994ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 15, 1994EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Nov 8, 1993EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 29, 1993CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 28, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 10, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 16, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance