USPTO serial 74272471
MIAMI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HORRALL, PATRICIA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MIAMI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | make-up, perfumes, colognes, deodorant and antiperspirant, hair shampoo; hair conditioner, hair dyes, non-medicated hair and skin care preparations, hair mousse, hair gels, hair lighteners, hair waving lotions, hair removing creams, depilatory waxes, hand, skin and body lotions, skin emollients, skin, face and body soaps, skin cleansing creams, skin toning creams, suntan lotions | ABANDONED | Dec 1, 1988 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 28, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 16, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 25, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |