USPTO serial 74272495
NIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 22, 1996
- Examiner
- WILLIAMS, IRENE
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with NIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Kanagawa, JP
Kanagawa, JP
Kanagawa, JP
KANAGAWA, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Neil A. Salyards
Neil A. Salyards PROCOPIO, CORY, HARGREAVES & SAVITCH LLP525 B Street, Suite 2200San Diego, CA 92101United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | racks for printed circuit boards and adjusters therefor [; cutters for dividing printed circuit boards ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Nikko Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha
- Other trademarks owned by Nikko Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha
- Other trademarks owned by Nikko Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha
- Other trademarks owned by KABUSHIKI KAISHA NIX
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named NIX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2026 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2016 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 17, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 15, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 2, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Dec 29, 2006 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 26, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 21, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 6, 2003 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 22, 2002 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 1996 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 30, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 28, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 4, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 20, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 1995 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Dec 1, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 4, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 9, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |