USPTO serial 74272734
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
E. Lynn Perry
E LYNN PERRY TOWNSEND AND TOWNSENDSTEUART ST TWR 20TH FLONE MARKET PLZSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | videotapes, multi-media computer software and instructional manuals provided as a unit, directed to parents, in the field of child education and development, and adult education | ABANDONED | — |
| 016 | printed materials in the aforementioned fields and directed to parents, comprising manuals, charts, bookmarks, newsletters, posters, written instructions, and logbooks | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | educational services directed to parents; namely, conducting classes and seminars in the fields of child education and development and adult education, and consulting related thereto | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 23, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 1992 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |