USPTO serial 74273032
BOGO'S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BOGO'S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRIAN J. LAURENZO
BRIAN J LAURENZO DAVIS, HOCKENBERG, WINE, BROWN, ET ALTHE FINANCIAL CTR666 WALNUT ST STE 2500DES MOINES, IA 50309-3993Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | retail grocery store services | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 1995 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 3, 1995 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 3, 1995 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Dec 8, 1994 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 26, 1994 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 21, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |