USPTO serial 74273608
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Canvasback Convertible Tops Inc.
Windsor, Ontario N9A-6P4, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frederick H. Colen
FREDERICK H COLEN REED SMITH SHAW & MCCLAYP O BOX 2009PITTSBURGH, PA 15230UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | pick-up truck covers | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 22, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |