Drawing for SOFTWARE HOUSE

USPTO serial 74273620

SOFTWARE HOUSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1787913Status 900
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 17, 1993
Examiner
BUSHEE, LINDA W.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SOFTWARE HOUSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PAUL T. KASHIMBA

IP LEGAL DEPARTMENT TYCO FIRE & SECURITY SERVICESONE TOWN CTR RDBOCA RATON, FL 33486UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009integrated security and facilities management systems for regulating personnel access to facilities, for protecting facilities and assets contained in facilities, for managing physical operation of facilities, and for reporting information on the same, comprising general purpose computers, computer terminals, printers, dedicated electronic system controllers, access card readers and numeric keypads, output switching relays for controlling door latches, and computer software; computer software for regulating personnel access to facilities, for protecting facilities and assets contained in facilities, for managing physical operation of facilities, and for reporting information on the same, and user manuals distributed therewith; and electronic components for use in integrated security and facilities management systems for regulating personnel access to facilities, for protecting facilities and assets contained in facilities, for managing physical operation of facilities, and for reporting information on the same; namely, general purpose computers, computer terminals, printers, dedicated electronic system controllers, access card readers; namely, magnetic stripe readers, Wiegand readers and proximity readers, numeric keypads, biometric identification input devices, closed circuit television switching devices, speech synthesizers and output switching relaysEXPIRED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 5, 2004CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Sep 24, 2003PR89POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9—
Sep 24, 2003C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Aug 18, 200389AFREGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED—
Aug 18, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Aug 18, 2003E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2000PR23RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 & 15—
Dec 22, 1999PR23POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15—
Aug 17, 1999815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Aug 17, 1993R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 25, 1993PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 23, 1993NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 9, 1993CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 11, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 16, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance