USPTO serial 74273814
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SEAN W. O'BRIEN
CATHY J LICHTER LOTT & FRIEDLAND, PA255 ALHAMBRA CIR STE 555POST OFFICE DRAWER 141098CORAL GABLES, FL 33114-1098| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | carbonated and non-carbonated drinking water, natural spring water, carbonated and non-carbonated drinking water with natural flavors, and tonic water | ABANDONED | Mar 10, 1992 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 1997 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 29, 1997 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 18, 1997 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 14, 1993 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 20, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 19, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 28, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 12, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |