USPTO serial 74274008
REOPT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, GLENN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with REOPT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen R. May
STEPHEN R MAY BATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTE902 BATTELLE BLVDP O BOX 999RICHLAND, WA 99352Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for remedial action options; namely, software for identification of alternative technologies for contaminated site clean up | ABANDONED | Apr 3, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 28, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 1995 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 20, 1995 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 28, 1994 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 1994 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Sep 12, 1994 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jul 5, 1994 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 1993 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 13, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 11, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 3, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 29, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |