USPTO serial 74274242
CLAIRE MURRAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2055629Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 22, 1997
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CLAIRE MURRAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ascutney, VT
Ascutney, VT
Ascutney, VT
Osterville, MA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LESLIE MEYER-LEON
LESLIE MEYER LEON Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP125 Summer StreetBoston, MA 02110-1618UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | quilts | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ANB International, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ANB International, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ANB International, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by MURRAY, CLAIRE
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named CLAIRE MURRAY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 22, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 30, 2007 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 30, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 12, 2003 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 22, 1997 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 26, 1997 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 7, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 1997 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 9, 1996 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 18, 1996 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 18, 1996 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 1996 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 9, 1996 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 1995 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 1995 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 12, 1995 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 18, 1995 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 31, 1995 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 13, 1995 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 26, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 24, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 31, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 27, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 15, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 8, 1994 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 11, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 12, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 27, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |