Drawing for INTELLIGENT INSTRUMENTATION

USPTO serial 74274331

INTELLIGENT INSTRUMENTATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1944825Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 2, 1996
Examiner
WILLIAMS, IRENE
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with INTELLIGENT INSTRUMENTATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William C. Cahill

WILLIAM C CAHILL CAHILL VON HELLENS & GLAZER PLC155 PARK ONE2141 E HIGHLAND AVEPHOENIX, AZ 85016

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009electronic I/O (input/output) boards and data acquisition boards for use in personal computers; computer operating programs for personal computers having data acquisition boards for gathering dataSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—
016computer instruction manuals in the field of operating personal computers having data acquisition boards for gathering dataSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 27, 2020CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Jun 21, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 12, 2006RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Apr 12, 200689AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Jan 2, 200689AFREGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED—
Jan 2, 2006E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Mar 5, 2002C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jan 7, 2002815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Jan 2, 1996R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 10, 1995PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 8, 1995NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 11, 1995CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 7, 1995JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 6, 1995EXPREX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED—
May 2, 1995CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Oct 6, 1994CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 1, 1993JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 1, 1993EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 1, 1993CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 27, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 19, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance