USPTO serial 74274653
THE AVERY H. SIMON CENTER FOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS LAW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MOORHEAD CORA ANN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE AVERY H. SIMON CENTER FOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS LAW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Diego, CA
San Diego, CA
San Diego, CA
San Diego, CA
San Diego, CA
San Diego, CA
San Diego, CA
San Diego, CA
San Diego, CA
San Diego, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kathleen A. Rabin
KATHLEEN A RABIN BROWN, MARTIN, HALLER & MCCLAIN1660 UNION STSAN DIEGO, CA 92101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | educational services; namely, seminars and classroom studies in telecommunications law | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Feldman, Richard
- Other trademarks owned by Howard, Joseph
- Other trademarks owned by Feldman, Richard
- Other trademarks owned by Howard, Joseph
- Other trademarks owned by Dietz, Mary Louise
- Other trademarks owned by Dietz, Mary Louise
- Other trademarks owned by Fisch, Sanford
- Other trademarks owned by Feldman, Selma
- Other trademarks owned by Fisch, Sanford
- Other trademarks owned by Feldman, Selma
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named THE AVERY H. SIMON CENTER FOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS LAW
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 1996 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 14, 1996 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 1996 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 1996 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 30, 1995 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 19, 1995 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 1995 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 19, 1995 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 7, 1994 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 7, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 15, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 11, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 14, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 22, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 23, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |