USPTO serial 74274690
SMART FLOOR BY TATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORDOVA, RAUL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SMART FLOOR BY TATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David J. Kera
DAVID J KERA OBLON, SPIVAK, MCCLELLAND, MAIER, ET ALFOURTH FL1755 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWYARLINGTON, VA 22202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | access floor panels constructed of steel panels with cementitious filling; pedestals made of metal | ABANDONED | — |
| 009 | metallic boxes with outlets providing connections for electrical power and data and communication wires and cables for use with access or temporary floors | ABANDONED | — |
| 011 | access floor panels with air-blowing fans and air discharge grilles | ABANDONED | — |
| 027 | carpet tiles for access or temporary floors | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TATE ACCESS FLOORS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by TATE ACCESS FLOORS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 027
- Similar marks named SMART FLOOR BY TATE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 1997 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 2, 1997 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 19, 1996 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 1996 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 27, 1996 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 1996 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 5, 1995 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 3, 1995 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 28, 1995 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 1994 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 27, 1994 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 28, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 5, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 4, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 6, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 22, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |