USPTO serial 74274886
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Montreal, Quebec H4P 1N3, CA
Montreal, Quebec H4P 1N3, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK S SOMMERS
MARK S SOMMERS FINNEGAN HENDERSON FARABOW GARRETT ET AL1300 I ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20005UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | T-shirts, sweaters, shorts and caps | ABANDONED | Jan 1, 1991 |
| 028 | in-line roller skates and their replacement parts (wheels, bearings, brakes, laces), knee pads, elbow pads, protective sporting helmets for skating and hockey protective gloves for in-line skating and ice skating, and hockey gloves and wristguards | ABANDONED | Jan 1, 1991 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 1999 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 14, 1995 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 7, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 1, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 29, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |