USPTO serial 74274982
ANSON'S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIAMS, IRENE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ANSON'S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
D-4000 Duesseldorf 1, DE
D-4000 Duesseldorf 1, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William D. Raman
WILLIAM D RAMAN ARNOLD, WHITE & DURKEEP O BOX 4433HOUSTON, TX 77210UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | games, playthings, gymnastic and sporting articles; namely, board games, card games, dice games, computer game programs, and equipment for various sports and games; namely, golf bag covers, golf bag tags, golf bags, golf ball markers, golf ball retrievers, golf balls, golf club heads, golf club inserts, golf clubs, golf tees, tennis rackets, tennis nets, tennis balls, tennis racket strings, tennis racket grips, footballs, football shoulder pads, football body protectors, football kicking tees, basketballs, basketball backboards, basketball goals, basketball nets, cricket balls, cricket bats, handballs, handball gloves, gymnastic horizontal bars, gymnastic parallel bars, gymnastic training stools, gymnastic vaulting horses, polo mallets, water skis, water ski ropes, water ski rope bridges, snow skis, snow ski poles, snow ski brakes, snow ski bindings and parts therefor, snow ski wax, and soccer balls | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 1995 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 21, 1994 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 16, 1994 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 29, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 4, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 3, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 29, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 27, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 11, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |