USPTO serial 74275142
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alan H. Bernstein
ALAN H BERNSTEIN CAESAR, RIVISE, BERNSTEIN, COHEN, ET ALSEVEN PENN CTR 12TH FL1635 MARKET STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2212| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | prerecorded video cassettes featuring therapeutic subjects for children, particularly for the prevention of child abuse and drug and alcohol abuse | ABANDONED | Oct 1, 1991 |
| 016 | educational publications; namely, books, pamphlets and posters on the subject of therapeutic subjects for children, particularly for the prevention of child abuse and drug and alcohol abuse | ABANDONED | Oct 1, 1991 |
| 028 | children's games; namely, board games and card games | ABANDONED | Oct 1, 1991 |
| 041 | educational research relating to the prevention of child abuse and drug and alcohol abuse | ABANDONED | Oct 1, 1991 |
| 042 | health care particularly for the prevention of child abuse and drug and alcohol abuse | ABANDONED | Oct 1, 1991 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 7, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 16, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 1995 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 23, 1994 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 6, 1994 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 15, 1994 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 9, 1994 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 19, 1994 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 16, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 19, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 27, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 25, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 7, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 4, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |