USPTO serial 74275487
FOOD CITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRIEDMAN, RICHARD A.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FOOD CITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Etobicoke, Ontario M9B 6B8, CA
Etobicoke, Ontario M9B 6B8, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cynthia Rowden
CYNTHIA ROWDEN ROGERS, BERESKIN & PARRSTE 4000 BOX 401 SCOTIA PLZ40 KING ST WTORONTO, ON M5H 3Y2Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | retail supermarket services and advising and counselling others with respect to the operation of retail supermarkets | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 1994 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 6, 1994 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 6, 1994 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 4, 1994 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 7, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 5, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 17, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 3, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 31, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 10, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |