Drawing for AMERICAN STAR

USPTO serial 74275792

AMERICAN STAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLARK, ROBERT C
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with AMERICAN STAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

H. John Campaign

ALLAN ZELNICK ESQ WEISS DAWID ZELNICK & LEHRMAN, PC633 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
034smoking tobacco made in whole or part of American tobaccoABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 16, 1996ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Dec 16, 1996OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Dec 16, 1996OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
May 30, 1995OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Dec 27, 1994PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 25, 1994NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 27, 1994CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 27, 1994ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 13, 1994CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 12, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 5, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 1994ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 7, 1994CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 22, 1994CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 24, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 1, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 9, 1993UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 8, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 4, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 12, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance