USPTO serial 74276203
KGRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 3, 1996
- Examiner
- MASIELLO, ANTHO
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with KGRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Troy, MI
Troy, MI
Troy, MI
TROY, MI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott S. Havlick
SCOTT S HAVLICK HOLLAND & HART LLPPO BOX 8749555 17TH ST STE 3200DENVER, CO 80201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | garden hose repair accessories, namely metal hose shutoffs and Y-connectors | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 1992 |
| 017 | non-metal couplings for use with garden hoses; repair accessories in the nature of couplings for garden hoses, namely plastic hose shut-offs and Y-connectors | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 1992 |
| 021 | garden hose sprayers and nozzles | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kmart Properties, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Kmart Properties, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Kmart Properties, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by KMART OF MICHIGAN INC
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named KGRO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2007 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 18, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 18, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2001 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 15, 2001 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 1996 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 24, 1996 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 7, 1996 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 1, 1996 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 19, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 26, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 25, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 8, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 6, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 1994 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 1, 1993 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Sep 28, 1993 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Aug 9, 1993 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 23, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |