Drawing for KGRO

USPTO serial 74276203

KGRO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1998484Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 3, 1996
Examiner
MASIELLO, ANTHO
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with KGRO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott S. Havlick

SCOTT S HAVLICK HOLLAND & HART LLPPO BOX 8749555 17TH ST STE 3200DENVER, CO 80201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006garden hose repair accessories, namely metal hose shutoffs and Y-connectorsSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJan 1, 1992
017non-metal couplings for use with garden hoses; repair accessories in the nature of couplings for garden hoses, namely plastic hose shut-offs and Y-connectorsSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJan 1, 1992
021garden hose sprayers and nozzlesSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJan 1, 1992

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 9, 2007CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Jul 14, 2006CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 18, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 18, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 6, 2001C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Oct 15, 2001815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Sep 3, 1996R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 24, 1996CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Jun 7, 1996SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 1, 1996IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Dec 19, 1995NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 26, 1995PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 25, 1995NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 8, 1995CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 6, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 2, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 17, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 18, 1994PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 1, 1993PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Sep 28, 1993PILMPETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED—
Aug 9, 1993PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
May 12, 1993ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 23, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance